cfe223 vs h335 No Further a Mystery

cfe223 vs h335 No Further a Mystery

Blog Article

If I remember correctly i bought it throughout the component scare,scarcity while in the ninety's and in no way applied it.

I looked at Hogdon's relative melt away fee chart & H335 seems being a great deal more rapidly than CFE. Varget and BL-C2 seem like much like CFE with regards to burn up charge.

All I am worried about is basic safety, I don't want to blow up the rifle or cause unneeded put on from excessive pressures. I'll admit I nonetheless don't absolutely get how the exact same charge in both of those conditions causes different pressures, Primarily after resizing and trimming but I am completely new to this.

I assume you recognize, but the utmost COL for journal feeding through an AR15 is usually regarded as being 2.26".  Anything past that is probably going to result in the bullet to hold-up within the journal.  For anyone who is manually feeding rounds separately, You will be Alright with all your stated COL, but I do not realize why you'd want to turn your RRA into an individual shot.

“Lots of people expend a whole lifetime wondering if they manufactured a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that trouble.” ― Ronald Reagan   oley55

I do have a little little bit of expertise with CFE 223.  I've a Hornady Digital powder measure/scale I take advantage of with the tough powders (like IMR4198 - my beloved .223 powder for tiny groups) that just will not throw consistent rates by way of a powder evaluate.  I bought a one lb. bottle of CFE223 to test with fifty five grain bullets.  I made use of that electronic evaluate/scale and that powder drove that Digital unit wild.  Wild?  For many reason that powder held supplying me overweight fees.

A wide choice of powders with the right burn up rate can be used to optimize .308 Winchester velocity and precision.

Which is also my varmint load mainly because it gives me sub MOA at more than 3kfps.  I am going to go examine website my notes and update if that assists.

Are you still researching loads! How bout you load some and go shoot some groups! If I'd have recognized this I would've just givin' you the bullets, loaded already.

Once the mil-surp stuff ran out while in the early 1990's, Hodgdon contracted to own the same powder made. I acquired a number of the new stuff but didn't know there was a difference. Experienced to reduce my extended-standing .223 loads two grains.

Spherical powders need that more shot from the magnum for trusted ignition, at least that is the idea. I have normally applied four hundred's in all my guns, which include with my ARs and have never experienced a problem either.

Horn, Though H335 will goes by means of your powder evaluate like $&@! via a goose, I think if you referred to as Hodgdon they would advocate Varget all of the way @ all-around 46gr. you will not recover precision within the moly bullets just it's possible a hair a lot less tension and when you start capturing them molys it'd take a several more photographs prior to they settle down into just one group.

1gr off, I'm not about to sweat it on a bulk load. Especially for ball powder. May affirm the very first three just after becoming pleased with wherever ten throw. Then do some randoms to make certain it has not walked. Ordinarily walk from the charge approximately with my very low-end Escale, then validate using a beam form for velocity.

Fast ahead a several years with a special new bolt action .223 and that very same load was providing me cratered primers and difficult to eject brass.